
Roadway Structural Analysis

Our team understands that managing the structural integrity of pavements is critical for ensuring long-lasting, safe, and efficient roadways. Our pavement structural testing services, enhanced by the Fast-Falling Weight Deflectometer (FastFWD), provide comprehensive and precise evaluations of pavement conditions. This advanced technology allows us to offer objective, repeatable, and rapid assessments, enabling informed decision-making and optimized project prioritization.
Fast-Falling Weight Deflectometer (FastFWD)
The FastFWD is a cutting-edge tool that simulates traffic loading by applying a dynamic load to the pavement surface and measuring its response (deflection). This data is crucial for assessing pavements’ load-carrying capacity and remaining service life.We provide a comprehensive assessment of pavement health by incorporating the Structural Index (SI) into each roadway’s Overall Pavement Condition Index (OCI) score. Furthermore, the SI plays a critical role in the decision-making process, helping to determine whether issues are confined to the surface or if there are significant structural problems. If the root cause lies within the subgrade or subbase, more intensive treatments can be selected; otherwise, lighter treatments may suffice. Integrating the SI into the decision-making process ensures more informed choices and a higher return on investment. The Fast FWD meets AASHTO R 32 specifications.

Structural Strength Assessment and Analysis
Upon completing the deflection survey, we perform a detailed structural analysis. The FastFWD applies a known load to the pavement, measuring its response to determine structural adequacy. The structural integrity of a roadway is expressed as an SI score ranging from 0 to 100, with key thresholds:SI > 75: Roads are structurally adequate and may be treated with lightweight surface treatments or thin overlays.
SI 50-75: Roads typically require additional pavement thickness.
SI < 50: Roads generally need reconstruction and increased base and pavement thickness.
Data-Driven Insights
Our structural adequacy plots visually represent the roadway’s structural performance and highlight subsurface issues, such as loss of subgrade support, that aren’t visible from the surface. These plots help identify underperforming roadways, pinpointing areas needing structural improvements. By using this data-driven approach, maintenance, and rehabilitation efforts are more accurately targeted, enhancing the overall efficiency of your pavement management program.Comprehensive Reporting
We provide detailed reports and analytics tailored to your specific needs. Our comprehensive reporting tools offer clear, actionable insights, enabling you to make informed decisions about your pavement management strategies.Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)
We frequently provide GPR data to complement FastFWD data for a further enhanced pavement condition assessment. GPR data collected via ASTM 4748-10 can be combined with other nondestructive data collection methods to determine the remaining life of pavements, structural number, pavement modulus, and subgrade modulus. GPR can also assess bridge decks, concrete, utility locating and mapping, and other project-specific use cases.Nondestructive Structural Testing
Our nondestructive testing methods provide valuable insights into roadways’ subsurface distress and structural conditions. This is especially important for areas with a history of milling and overlays, varying soil conditions, or other environmental factors that require a deeper understanding to determine the most cost-effective rehabilitation strategy.Benefits of Structural Testing
The substructure of a road, which cannot be seen, is the most significant determining factor in the long-term performance of pavement.
- Every preservation treatment and minor rehabilitation is a potential waste of money if the structure of the road is not adequate to support the traffic loads.
- Alligator cracking may not always indicate structural failure! Pavements that have age-related alligator cracking that is a result of the binder having oxidized and become brittle may be structurally adequate and only require resurfacing, as opposed to rehabilitation. This can be identified with FWD testing and further confirmed from the rutting results and substantially reduce the treatment costs.
- The structural strength of a road is especially important for roads with higher and heavier (truck) traffic. Inadequate structure on roads with more traffic may deteriorate much faster than expected.
The interpretation of FWD data is greatly enhanced by reliable traffic data, in particular the heavy vehicle composition and traffic volumes (i.e. AADT).
FWD testing, together with surface condition data collection, ensures that treatments are targeting the actual pavement needs, maximizing budget efficiency.
How Structural Data Enhances PMS Decisions
The chart below shows how structural data greatly expands the number of possible treatment recommendations. Without incorporating structural analysis, we’re only using the first column. With structural data, we can access the whole table. For example, if both surface condition and structural condition suggest the need for reconstruction (RC), then reconstruction is indeed necessary. If surface condition suggests preventative maintenance (PM), but structural condition suggests reconstruction (RC), then the PM should not be performed and instead we should do nothing (DN). Relying solely on surface condition (e.g. PCI) is insufficient for this determination. Studies have shown that using PCI can lead to biased recommendations when structural indices are not considered.
Credit: Brian Diefenderfer (VDOT, VTTI)
Further Reading
Studies indicate that deflection data can be used not only to assess existing damage but also to inform preventive measures for future damage. Furthermore, Pereira et al. (2022) highlighted TSDD’s ability to detect subtle changes in structural integrity, which can support more accurate pavement health indices when integrated with traditional pavement condition measures.
In the current state of practice, most departments of transportation (DOTs) and city municipalities assume visual pavement condition ratings, windshield surveys, or automated distress collection provide adequate information about the overall in-situ condition of the pavement. Therefore, structural indicators have generally been left for project-level evaluations and designs (Bryce et al., 2013). However, research studies have shown that the structural condition of the pavement should be considered for an unbiased and correct assessment of the road network (Bryce et al., 2013).
Another research study by New Jersey DOT suggested that network-level decisions made based only on surface condition were significantly different from those made with deflection testing (Zaghloul et al., 1998). In addition, for some agencies where surface treatments such as microsurfacing, seal coating, and slurry seal are often used to cover the distresses at the surface for aesthetics purposes or preserving the road, the visual pavement evaluation could be misleading in the decision-making process since cracks and distresses are concealed. These results and studies suggest that the visual pavement indicators such as Pavement Condition Index (PCI) could be independent from underlying structural conditions. Therefore, pavement management informed with structural evaluation provides a unique opportunity for proactive pavement management which may close the gap between budget allocations and project needs due to better and more cost-effective pavement rehabilitation options (Zaghloul et al., 1998).
Advanced Structural Testing
Enhance your pavement management process with our advanced structural testing services. Contact us today to learn how we can help you maintain safe, durable, and cost-effective roadways.Our clients
















